HK LIANYIXIN INDUSTRIAL CO., LIMITED  |  aero@uavchip.com  |  +86 157-0660-6161
← Back to Blog
Power Design

Power Management ICs for UAV Design: TPS563201, MP2307, and DC-DC Buck Converters Explained

March 2025  ·  10 min read  ·  UAVCHIP Engineering Team

DC-DC buck converter power management PCB for UAV design
A well-designed power tree is the foundation of any reliable drone. This guide covers DC-DC buck converter selection, efficiency calculations, LDO sequencing, and real-world power design patterns used in professional UAV flight controllers.

UAV electronics typically operate from a 2S–6S LiPo battery (7.4 V–25.2 V) and need to power multiple subsystems at different voltages: 5V for the flight controller and GPS, 3.3V for sensors and flash memory, 12V for video transmitters, and 5V–12V for servos. The power management design determines efficiency, EMI noise, and ultimately the mission duration of the aircraft.

DC-DC Buck Converter vs LDO: Which to Use?

The fundamental choice in drone power design is between a linear regulator (LDO) and a switching regulator (DC-DC buck converter).

ParameterLDO RegulatorDC-DC Buck Converter
EfficiencyVout/Vin (can be 30–50%)85–95%
Heat dissipationHigh (Pdiss = (Vin-Vout)*I)Low (5–15% of output power)
Output noiseVery low (<10 µV RMS)Moderate (need output filter)
Component count1 IC + 2–3 capsIC + inductor + caps
Cost$0.20–$1$0.50–$3
Best usePost-regulation (noise-sensitive)Primary regulation (efficiency)

For a flight controller powered from a 4S LiPo (16.8 V) providing a 5V/1A rail: an LDO dissipates (16.8–5) × 1 = 11.8W as heat — requiring a heatsink and causing significant efficiency loss. A 90% efficient buck converter dissipates only 0.5W. This is why all modern UAV power systems use buck converters for primary regulation.

TPS563201: The Popular 3A Buck for Flight Controllers

Texas Instruments' TPS563201 is one of the most widely used buck converters on drone flight controller boards. Key specifications:

The TPS563201 is found on Kakute F4/F7/H7, OMNIBUSF4, and many other popular flight controller boards. Its small SOT-23 footprint makes it ideal for compact 20x20 mm FC designs, and its 580 kHz switching frequency is above the audible range but below the IMU sampling frequency — avoiding direct interference with sensor readings.

TPS5430: Higher Voltage Input for 6S Designs

For 5S and 6S LiPo applications (up to 25.2 V), the TPS5430 is the appropriate choice. It handles inputs up to 36 V and provides 3A output. Configuration is slightly more complex (external inductor, feedback network) but performance is excellent. Common in long-range fixed-wing and heavy-lift octocopter designs that run 6S batteries for higher motor efficiency.

MP2307: The Alternative Buck for Cost-Optimized Designs

Monolithic Power Systems' MP2307 is a direct competitor to the TPS5630x family. It offers:

The 1.5 MHz switching frequency allows using a smaller inductor (2.2 µH vs 10 µH for TPS563201), reducing BOM cost and PCB area. The trade-off is slightly higher EMI at the switching frequency — use adequate output filtering if the module is near sensitive analog circuits.

Practical Power Rail Design for a Flight Controller

A typical flight controller power tree looks like this:

  1. Battery input (2S–4S, 7.4–16.8 V) → TVS diode for protection → bulk capacitance (470–1000 µF)
  2. 5V main rail: TPS563201 or MP2307 → 5V/3A for FC main MCU, GPS, ESC signal, servos
  3. 3.3V rail: LDO (e.g. AMS1117-3.3 or LP2985) post-regulated from 5V → IMU, flash memory, SBUS/DSM receiver
  4. 12V rail (optional): Separate buck for VTX (video transmitter), which often needs 9–12V for full power output
  5. VBat monitor: Resistor divider to MCU ADC for battery voltage measurement

The 3.3V LDO post-regulating from 5V (rather than directly from battery) reduces noise on the sensitive analog supply. The dropout voltage for 5V→3.3V is only 1.7V, which keeps the LDO dissipation low (1.7V × 200mA = 340 mW — manageable without a heatsink).

EMI Considerations in UAV Power Design

Switching converters generate significant radiated EMI due to their fast switching edges (high dV/dt). For drone applications, the key concerns are:

Inductor and Capacitor Selection

The output inductor value affects ripple current and transient response. For TPS563201 at 580 kHz with 5V output from 12V input:

Use X5R or X7R ceramic capacitors for switching converters — avoid Y5V/Z5U which lose capacitance dramatically at DC bias and at temperature extremes relevant to drone operation.

Source Power Management ICs for Your UAV Design

UAVCHIP stocks TPS563201, TPS5430, TPS54331, MP2307, and TPS62110 in all package options. Fast delivery for engineering samples and production volumes.

View TPS563201 View MP2307 Submit RFQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if my buck converter's input voltage exceeds its rating during battery inrush?

Most modern DC-DC buck converters have built-in overvoltage lockout (UVLO/OVLO). If Vin exceeds the maximum rating, the converter enters protection and shuts down. To prevent inrush voltage spikes, use a TVS diode on the battery input (e.g. SMAJ18A for 4S) and ensure your bulk input capacitor is pre-charged via a soft-start circuit or current-limiting resistor during plug-in. In-rush can be 5–10× normal operating voltage transiently if not managed.

Can I use TPS563201 for a 5S or 6S battery?

No — TPS563201 is rated to 17V maximum input. A fully charged 5S LiPo is 21V, which exceeds the absolute maximum rating and risks destroying the IC. Use TPS5430 (36V max input) for 5S/6S designs. Alternatively, use a pre-regulator to drop the battery voltage before the TPS563201.

How do I calculate the output voltage of TPS563201?

Vout = 0.765 × (1 + R1/R2) where 0.765V is the internal reference voltage. For 5V output: if R2 = 10 kΩ, then R1 = 10k × (5/0.765 - 1) = 55.36 kΩ → use 56.2 kΩ standard value. For 3.3V: R1 = 10k × (3.3/0.765 - 1) = 33.1 kΩ → use 33.2 kΩ. Always verify with the datasheet formula as parasitic effects at high frequency can shift the actual output slightly.

Should I use synchronous or non-synchronous buck converter for drone FCs?

Synchronous converters (like TPS563201) replace the catch diode with a low-RDS(on) MOSFET, dramatically improving efficiency at moderate and heavy loads. For drone flight controllers where efficiency matters (it directly affects flight time), always choose synchronous converters for the main power rails. Non-synchronous converters are acceptable only for very low current auxiliary rails (under 100 mA).

Related Articles